‘On the ropes,’ 3M’s Cottage Grove workers say they’re ready to strike

Steelworkers who staff 3M's Cottage Grove plant picket outside corporate headquarters in Maplewood.

Steelworkers who staff 3M’s Cottage Grove plant picket outside corporate headquarters in Maplewood.

 

UPDATE 9/29/16 – United Steelworkers Local 11-00418 announced on its Facebook page that its members will vote on a contract proposal from the company, reached during bargaining Monday.

The local is withholding details of the proposal until the ratification vote Oct. 3, but acknowledged that it made some concessions to the company:

“You all know the company we work for. You know that they didn’t spend all day with us apologizing for the last 3 months. You know that they didn’t see the error in their ways, and offer us a contract with no takeaways.”

*****

Frustrated by management’s cuts-only approach to contract talks, Steelworkers employed at 3M’s chemicals plant in Cottage Grove voted overwhelmingly Sept. 1 to authorize their bargaining team to call a strike if necessary.

But members of United Steelworkers Local 11-00418 aren’t waiting for a strike to call out 3M publicly.

For the second time this month, workers staged informational picketing outside 3M’s corporate campus in Maplewood today. They have picketed the Cottage Grove plant several times in recent weeks, and union leaders say picketing will continue until workers get the contract they deserve.

“We’re serious,” Local 11-00418 President Mike Schanks said. “We’re not going to give up without a fight.”

The union represents about 380 workers at 3M’s facility, the largest private employer in Cottage Grove. Their previous contract with the company has expired, but in bargaining Friday the two sides agreed to extend the agreement, in seven-day increments, as long as negotiations continue.

Common ground has been hard to come by in talks so far, and workers say it’s because 3M insists on rolling back several key provisions of their previous contract, including premium pay for weekend work and seniority-based layoffs during slowdowns at the plant.

Additionally, the company wants to reduce its contribution to workers’ 401(k) retirement plans – and the power to force workers to take extra shifts without paying overtime wages, even on scheduled days off.

“Right now if you come in on a day off, it’s automatically time and a half,” Steelworkers staff representative Brian Ecker said. “We have concerns about the safety aspect of working 12-hour shifts and then being forced to work on your day off.”

web-3m-usw2Schanks added: “Half of the facility is a chemical factory. We’re concerned about long hours, injuries and spills.”

So far, the company has shown little interest in meeting the union halfway, refusing to take up several proposals workers thought would be easy asks of the company.

“We actually have a proposal on the table about honorably discharged veterans being granted a day off per year – not even with pay, using their vacation – and they won’t even give us that,” Ecker said. “That’s kind of how this has gone. We’ve been on the ropes pretty hard.”

Schanks laughed at the notion 3M needs concessions out of its Cottage Grove workers to stay profitable.

“They’ve got record profits,” he said. But after so many other manufacturers have picked up and left the area for cheaper labor markets abroad, 3M is “kind of using fear as a tactic.”

“They’re being very greedy this time around,” Schanks said. “They want to take the whole pie and leave us a few crumbs.”

Negotiations are scheduled to resume Saturday and, if necessary, next Monday. Schanks said he doesn’t foresee a strike “as long as progress is being made” at the bargaining table.

To find out when and where union members are picketing the company – and join them on the line – monitor Local 11-00418’s Facebook page.

‘I don’t have a pension … What makes you so special?’

Cretex worker Arturo Sanchez mans the picket line outside the company's Shakopee facility, where members of Laborers Local 563 are on strike to keep their defined-benefit retirement plan.

Cretex worker Arturo Sanchez mans the picket line outside the company’s Shakopee facility, where members of Laborers Local 563 are on strike to keep their defined-benefit retirement plan.

If your job offers a defined-benefit retirement plan, odds are good you’ve heard it before, maybe even across the negotiating table: Pensions are a relic of the past.

Bolstered by slick marketing campaigns underwritten by Wall Street investment firms, employers have been successful in convincing a generation of American workers they don’t need pensions to have a secure retirement. But a growing body of research suggests the alternatives – 401(k) and other defined-contribution plans – are very risky business, and the U.S. may be headed for a retirement crisis as a result.

A March 2013 report by the New School’s Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis estimated that 75 percent of American workers ages 50 to 64 – those nearing retirement, or so they think – had an average retirement savings balance of less than $27,000 in 2010. Even among higher income brackets, the numbers are grim. Roughly half of retirees-to-be in the top 25 percent of earners have retirement savings balances of only $52,000, the report found.

Of course, that’s nowhere near enough money for a secure retirement, even when combined with Social Security income. In fact, a 2010 study by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College found an estimated $6.6 trillion gap between the money workers ages 32 to 64 will need in retirement and the money they will have during retirement.

So the next time someone asks why you think you deserve a pension, you might ask them whether they plan on winning the lottery or working into their 70s.

[Related Story: Laborers on strike in Shakopee to protect pension benefits]