Twin Cities Habitat workers vote to unionize with AFSCME

Workers at Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity have voted to form a union, becoming the newest group of nonprofit employees to organize with Council 5 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

The new bargaining unit brings together about 100 workers from Twin Cities Habitat and its lending subsidiary, TCHFH Lending, Inc. Members work in construction, real estate, the Habitat ReStore, resource development and other programs and services.

The National Labor Relations Board tallied results of the mail-in election March 17. The union prevailed 43-31, with eight void ballots and one challenged ballot.

The St. Paul-based employer and Council 5 released a joint statement from their leaders – Council 5 Executive Director Bart Andersen, Twin Cities Habitat CEO Chris Coleman and TCHFH Lending President Robyn Bipes-Timm – pledging to move forward together.

“Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity and AFSCME Council 5 believe every eligible employee deserves the opportunity to make their choice freely and privately, and Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity shared with staff that their decision would be supported no matter the outcome,” the statement reads.

“Our entities are fully invested in our team members. We are appreciative of the respectful approach and investment shown throughout this process from eligible employees, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, TCHFH Lending, Inc., and AFSCME Council 5, and we thank the NLRB for facilitating the vote.”

Twin Cities Habitat workers formally requested recognition of their union from management in late January.

The union launched an Instagram account around the same time.

The Twin Cities Habitat campaign is the latest in a string of successful nonprofit organizing drives supported by Council 5 in recent years, from legal-aid and health-outreach services across the region to cultural hubs like the Minnesota Historical Society, the Walker Art Center and the Science Museum of Minnesota.

Andersen, Council 5’s executive director, said unions across the country are seeing an “explosion” of interest from workers – and organizing to meet that demand.

“These workers are fighting to ensure they have a voice on the job and can collectively bargain for higher wages, better benefits, safety on the job and dignity and respect for the work they do to uplift our communities,” Andersen said. “Labor unions not only have a duty and responsibility to build our unions internally, but to also ensure we provide a space and support for unorganized workers to come to and help form a union in their workplace.”

Unions decry state lawmakers’ move to close Stillwater prison

Corrections officers and other Stillwater prison workers are demanding that state leaders reconsider their plan, announced as part of a bipartisan budget agreement earlier this month, to close the facility by 2029.

That is, if they have a plan.

Members of AFSCME Council 5 and the Minnesota Association of Professional Employees say the state should have consulted them before making the announcement, which impacts about 560 workers and 1,200 offenders housed at the Washington County facility, which is actually located in Bayport.

Instead, union leaders said, they got a call about 15 minutes before the news became public May 15.

“I find it hard to believe that this chip that was put on the table at the 11th hour wasn’t discussed thoroughly before it got put on the table,” Council 5 Executive Director Bart Andersen said. “There had to have been various conversations about what could the implications of this be. Did anybody think about that? Because if they would have asked us, we would have had a laundry list of concerns.”

Those concerns include how the state’s other prisons will absorb inmates from Stillwater – and do it safely.

“If there are 1,200 beds within the Minnesota Department of Corrections, we would like to see where those are,” Dan Gorman, who has worked as an officer in Stillwater for 20 years, said during a Capitol press conference the day after state leaders’ announcement.

Gorman added that the roughly 450 AFSCME members who work at the facility had been told by management that the prison’s population would reduce by half over the next “two or three years” before closing in the fourth year. Stillwater’s level-four security designation means that it can house the state’s most serious offenders.

“Now you start sending those (offenders) to other facilities, overpopulating those facilities, and it makes it very dangerous for the inmate population and for the staff that work in those facilities,” Gorman said.

Jeff Larson, chair of Council 5’s corrections officer council, said workers across Minnesota’s prisons were bracing for the impact of closing the system’s second-largest facility.

“Moving hundreds of staff and offenders across the state with no clear-cut plan?” Larson said. “That’s dangerous.”

Prison workers also expressed concerns for their careers, their families and the local community.

“I’ve had co-workers in tears,” Gorman said. “I’ve had seasoned officers coming to me and telling me they don’t know how much more of this they can take. And I’ve had new officers questioning whether they made the right choice joining this department at all.”

MAPE President Megan Dayton, whose union represents caseworkers and other workers in the DOC, said the community members deserved transparency and a chance to offer feedback before lawmakers arrived at the decision. Instead, they got “another behind-closed-doors decision.”

“That is not planning; that is scrambling,” Dayton said.

State officials argued that the prison has become less safe as it has fallen into greater disrepair. Its backlog of deferred maintenance projects would cost an estimated $700 million to address, according to a state analysis issued five years ago.

But Gorman pointed to a list of low-cost security improvements rejected by the agency in recent years, and Andersen said the state could invest in keeping the 111-year-old prison, which is on the National Register of Historic Places.

“This Capitol is not brand new,” Andersen said. “The Governor’s Mansion is not brand new. There’s a brand new Senate building. There were capital investments to make sure all those facilities are up and running and renovated and maintained. Why can’t that happen with Stillwater?”

The news about Stillwater prison came as Walz’s administration was negotiating new union contracts with MAPE and Council 5’s state-employee locals, covering over 40,000 employees.

Those talks got off to a contentious start this spring after the governor unilaterally changed the state’s policy on remote work, giving thousands of workers mere months to plan for a partial return to the office.

Union leaders said they expect better from Walz and other elected officials who claim to support labor and law enforcement, but hope there’s still time to reverse course.

“You love to stand next to us when we have our uniforms on and take pictures with us and claim you support us,” Gorman said. “This is a moment to have your vote match your words or your social media posts.”

AFSCME members to Ramsey County: ‘Residents First = Workers First’

AFSCME members who work at Ramsey County held a contract rally outside the Ramsey County Courthouse in St. Paul Oct. 29.

Four local unions representing over 2,000 Ramsey County employees are holding firm to their key demands – dignified wages, safe and adequate staffing, and respect on the job – as bargaining with the county inches closer to their contracts’ Dec. 31 expiration date.

Members of AFSCME Locals 8, 151, 707 and 1935 – librarians, social workers, child protection workers, parks employees and workers in scores of other job classifications – were also holding firm to their solidarity, union members said during a rally outside the Ramsey County Courthouse as talks entered a third month.

“The employer is still using the same old playbook of stalling, sewing division amongst the locals and attempting to erode our union legacy rights like seniority, the freedom to determine when we take vacation or receiving extra payments for working undesirable shifts,” Local 8 President Mario Lee, an animal control officer, said Oct. 29.

Rather than asking their employees for takebacks at the bargaining table, county administrators should be engaging their unions in meaningful discussions about how to address serious staffing shortfalls plaguing several county agencies, Lee and other union leaders said.

Several media reports in the last year have exposed the impact short staffing has had on county services. An October 2024 report by KSTP-TV found that the county’s Medical Assistance program had a backlog applications for benefit renewal, with more than 500 applicants waiting over 60 days.

Peggy Bloomstrand, a social worker and president of Local 151, said the county’s service delays are not isolated to Medical Assistance.

“Children at risk of abuse and neglect are not getting the services they need because our child protection workers are overwhelmed with high caseload sizes,” Bloomstrand said. “Support staff are working overtime to process cases…

“And it’s not because of the workforce,” she said. “It’s because Ramsey County has decided to eliminate positions and add top management that don’t work with clients or residents.”

“You have been asked countless times, consistently, every day to do more with less,” AFSCME Council 5 Executive Director Bart Andersen told county workers. “I’m sorry, but more with less is simply unsustainable.

“Your employers should be coming to the table proposing respectful wages, affordable health care, workplace safety and protections.”

Members of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners, in voting to raise their own salaries by 3 to 5% earlier in 2024, cited the need to attract quality candidates – a fact not lost on union members, who say their pay has fallen by 13.5% over the last four years when adjusted for inflation.

According to an AFSCME payroll analysis, Ramsey County frontline workers’ wages are the 65th percentile in comparisons with their peers. Union members say the county needs to offer better compensation to recruit and retain staff in many positions, especially given the cost of living in the area and the scope of their work.

“We want a contract that aligns with the work we do and enables us to support our families,” Bloomstrand said. “We want more staff so our workforce has the ability to serve residents of Ramsey County.”

Those residents are making their voices heard in the bargaining process, too.

After their Oct. 29 rally, union members delivered a petition with over 1,000 signatures to the County Board. County workers gathered many of the signatures outside county libraries and other facilities, engaging residents in conversations about their campaign for adequate staffing and respect on the job.

“Our members go above and beyond the work they do, and we’re asking Ramsey County to compensate our members fairly for the work they do,” Bloomstrand said. “Hire additional staff so our residents get the service they need, and provide safe staffing levels.”

Ramsey County residents can sign onto AFSCME members’ petition in support of their contract campaign here.