Letters to the editor: DFL caucuses, HHS budget, communism

DFL-logo-RGBEmphasizing the ‘L’ in ‘DFL’

Joan and I attended the city precinct caucus on April 16, 2013, at the Highland High School. We are new members of the Highland community after living on the East Side for over 50 years. It was a great experience meeting people who we have known ourselves in our new community. We easily got elected to the city convention, and I look forward to our political life in the Highland community.

I was so pleased to hear the encouragement of the St. Paul Regional Labor Federation and, particularly, President Bobby Kasper to attend the caucus and get involved in our community. In our democracy we have the great opportunity to have a say about important issues that affect us. We all know we have the opportunity to vote, but get frustrated because it appears that the public officials we elect fail to represent us. Public officials who are wanting to run for re-election or aspiring political persons who are seeking their first political office do remember the issues and values of delegates who can and do provide the votes they will need for future endorsements.

Many of us have dreamed for years to have a Labor political party. If we all attended the DFL caucuses, we could easily put labor into the DFL party.

– Wayne Wittman, Machinists Local Lodge 459

********

Don’t gut Health & Human Services

During the last three to four years, major cuts were made to the Health and Human Services budget. There were over $60 million in cuts made to the mental health system – a fragile and underfunded system. I can’t understand why the Democrats in the Legislature would propose cutting over $150 million from Health and Human Services. This funding takes care of children and adults with mental illnesses, people with other disabilities and older adults. It funds mental health centers and providers, hospitals and nursing homes.

I urge our legislators to revisit this decision. It will have a negative impact on our community.

– Shelley Burns

********

Why resurrect fight over communism?

The March issue of The Advocate contained an article from the archives with the heading: “75 Years Ago: Fighting Communism.” Why the resurrection of this piece? Presently, one wonders if these early communists were not correct in their belief that capitalism is inherently unjust, unstable and unsustainable. Were they also correct to suggest that workers not soldier up their children for so many cruel and unjust wars?

Yet the modern Advocate appears to have echoed the old declaration: “Compromise with communists would be suicidal.” Should “pleas for tolerance, unity and harmony” continue to be ignored in favor of “a pragmatic approach?”

Pardon me, but the historic accommodation between labor and capital has brought us now to what state of affairs?

– Peter Molenaar, Teamsters 970

‘Home Hankies’ fueled seniors’ rally for tax justice

Minnesota’s seniors waved World Series-inspired “Home” Hankies at a Capitol rally focused on making the state’s tax system fairer for people living on fixed incomes.

Minnesota’s seniors waved World Series-inspired “Home” Hankies at a Capitol rally focused on making the state’s tax system fairer for people living on fixed incomes.

In October 1987, “homer hankies” provided the magic the Minnesota Twins needed to win their first World Series championship. Five months later, Minnesota’s seniors attempted to recapture the magic during a rally for tax fairness at the Capitol.

Seniors waved “home hankies,” during an event March 2, 1988, co-sponsored by the Minnesota Senior Federation and the labor-backed Minnesota Citizens for Tax Justice. The hankies – printed with the message, “Don’t tax us out of our homes!” – were delivered to Gov. Rudy Perpich after the rally, along with personal messages about tax issues, The Union Advocate reported.

Speakers at the rally focused on making the state’s tax system fairer for people living on fixed incomes. They advocated restoring cuts to the renters’ tax credit and removing sales taxes on non-prescription drugs like aspirin.

When lawmakers addressed the rally, retirees weren’t shy about making their feelings known.

“Senate Majority Leader Roger Moe, DFL- Erskine, was greeted with loud boos as he addressed the group,” The Advocate reported. “He said legislators planned to discuss all of the issues mentioned, but added, ‘More than likely you won’t get everything you want.’”

[The Union Advocate’s “This Month in the Archives” feature offers a look back at what the newspaper was reporting from 5 to 100 years ago. Our digital archives are online, searchable and free to anyone. Click here for access.]

• 75 Years Ago: Fighting communism

There was no room for communists in the labor movement or the Farmer-Labor Party, the March 24, 1938, edition of The Union Advocate proclaimed on its front page.

After three communists were expelled from the central committee of the Ramsey County Farmer-Labor Party, The Advocate weighed in with an editorial endorsing the purge – and warning union leaders that compromise with communists “would be suicidal.”

With an eye on the upcoming Farmer Labor Party state convention, where delegates would endorse a candidate for governor, The Advocate warned union delegates to prepare to hear “all the usual pleas and arguments used by the communists.” That included “pleas for tolerance, unity and harmony,” as well as “eloquent appeals to leave red-baiting to the Republicans, to the reactionary, time-serving daily press and to the hirelings of big business.”

The Advocate editorial brushed off these arguments, taking a pragmatic approach instead.

“Labor is well aware of the fact that the common weapon of reaction is to attempt to discredit the Labor movement with unfounded charges that it is communistic, that it is financed from Moscow, that it is un-American and antisocial,” the editorial said.

For this reason, the American Federation of Labor had barred communists from membership.

“Let Labor remember that it cannot break political bread with those it refuses to accept into its own household,” the editorial added. “Let Labor remember that communists are no more desirable in a political organization in which Labor has a vital interest than they are in the trade union movement from which they are specifically excluded.”

• 50 Years Ago: Unions rally against legislative attacks

In response to “the most vicious anti-union attacks in many years,” more than 450 labor activists from across Minnesota rallied March 12, 1938, at the St. Paul Labor Temple, approving by acclamation a course of action containing “various counter-measures.”

The most pressing concern, The Advocate reported, was legislation being pushed by the Minnesota Employers Association to disqualify thousands of workers from eligibility for unemployment insurance – and to “to reduce sharply the duration of payments for countless of thousands of others.”

Union leaders urged bargaining units across the state to put their employers on notice that they intended to negotiate supplementary unemployment benefits into their next contract – a way of “winning back at the bargaining table what is lost by legislation.”

Additionally, Minnesota AFL-CIO President Robert Olson warned of legislative efforts to make it illegal for unions to contribute to political causes or campaigns. He said the rally sent a strong message that unions would stand together against attempts to erode their political power.

“We have been slowed down before,” Olson said, “but they have never stopped us and they never will.”