Legislative committee investigates higher levels of temp-agency employment

Enrique Barcenas, pictured while speaking at a Black Friday march in St. Paul, testified before the Legislature's Select Committee on Living Wage jobs.

Enrique Barcenas, pictured while speaking at a Black Friday march in St. Paul, testified before the Legislature’s Select Committee on Living Wage jobs.

Minnesota’s economy continues to recover from the Great Recession, but an increasing number of workers are finding employment through temp agencies and subcontracting firms. That trend drew scrutiny from the Legislature’s Select Committee on Living Wage Jobs at a hearing Dec. 19 in St. Paul.

Jobs in the economy’s “employment services” sector, which includes subcontractors and temp agencies, is up 42 percent since November 2009, Steve Hine of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development told lawmakers on the committee, chaired by DFL Rep. Ryan Winkler of Golden Valley.

Temporary work is known to be cyclical, dropping off at the start of economic downturns and picking up at the beginning of recoveries. But Hine also attributed the increase in temporary jobs to “an outsourcing of many business services … that used to be done in-house.”

Staffing agencies and subcontractors enable businesses to outsource everything from maintenance to human resources, shifting the legal responsibilities of employment onto the subcontractor.

Owners of staffing firms and temp agencies claim their business attract workers looking for experience, flexibility or a foot in the door to a new career.

But those benefits come at a steep price for workers and the state, according to Jessica Webster, an attorney with Legal Aid who has represented temps in unemployment-insurance cases.

Webster said the temp-agency industry has a “carve-out” in Minnesota law that makes it difficult for their workers to qualify for unemployment benefits. Even when temps are legally eligible for unemployment, Webster said, agencies fight unemployment claims at an inordinate rate, compared to other employers.

That creates an extra burden on state administrators who process workers’ appeals, she said, but unemployment appeals aren’t the only burden the recent explosion of temp work has created for government agencies.

As agencies compete to provide staffing for businesses at lower costs, it depresses the wages they are able to pay. Many temp workers, Webster added, rely on public assistance to support themselves or their families.

“We see them on our SNAP, we see them accessing child-care dollars in Minnesota, we see them accessing (public) health care,” Webster said. “They are a cost to Minnesota in many ways.”

The “race to the bottom” benefits only those at the top, said Enrique Barcenas, who works for Prestige Maintenance, one of several cleaning contractors retained by Target in the Twin Cities.

“I don’t need to be a big business owner to understand the policy they use,” Barcenas told lawmakers through a translator. “If I see someone is going to charge less, I’m obviously going to contract with them, and then the people who work are making less.

“The only people who benefit are the ones at the top, and maybe in the middle, but the ones at the bottom, they get stepped on.”

By the very nature of their employment conditions, temp workers are difficult to organize, but the Greater Minnesota Worker Center, a community-based coalition that supports low-wage workers in the St. Cloud area, has had some success.

Stephen Philion, chair of the Worker Center and a sociology professor at St. Cloud State, told lawmakers that temp workers, backed by community leaders supportive of the Worker Center, approached management at a Jennie-O turkey-processing plant in the area and asked them to drop its relationship with a temp agency and hire workers directly.

Jennie-O agreed, and workers at the plant, Philion said, report a “very real and very dramatic” improvement.

By linking workers with labor unions, nonprofit charities and faith communities, worker centers put employers on notice that temp workers “are part of a broader community that is concerned about their fate and sees their fate tied in with the broader community’s ability to experience economic development,” Philion added.

Report shows passenger service workers earn poverty-level wages at MSP Airport

State Rep. Ryan Winkler (right), co-author of a bill to raise Minnesota's minimum wage to $9.50 by 2015, greets Darcy Landau before a press conference outside Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

State Rep. Ryan Winkler (right), co-author of a bill to raise Minnesota’s minimum wage to $9.50 by 2015, greets Darcy Landau before a press conference outside Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

As a military veteran with a college education, Darcy Landau is overqualified for his job as a wheelchair agent at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Earning wages of $7.25 per hour, Landau struggles to make monthly car payments, pay back his student loans and meet his basic needs.

“If it weren’t for the VA,” Landau said, “I don’t know how I’d survive.”

Landau’s is hardly an isolated case. Low-wage jobs have provided the fragile foundation for the current U.S. economic recovery, accounting for more than half of the jobs created since 2010. As more and more adults turn to retail, service, hospitality and temporary jobs, public scrutiny of wages paid in those industries is increasing.

A report unveiled yesterday sheds light on the working conditions of Landau and roughly 600 other passenger-service workers at MSP, including cabin cleaners, wheelchair agents and motorized cart drivers. Its findings reveal that many earn wages at or near the legal minimum, even after many years on the job. Few can afford the health care insurance offered by their employers, and many  say they are forced to access public services like food stamps and Medicaid to meet their basic needs.

Jordan Ash, an organizer for Local 26 of the Service Employees International Union, which compiled the report, said the public is essentially “subsidizing poverty wages at MSP” to the tune of $1.7 million per year.

Local 26 has been working with passenger-service workers on a union-organizing drive for the last two years. But at a press conference outside Terminal 1 yesterday, workers and community leaders pointed to the report’s findings as yet another reason to raise the state’s minimum wage.

[Click here to sign the petition in support of a $9.50 minimum wage in Minnesota.]

“We can’t afford to live with a $7.25 minimum wage, to pay our bills,” said Misrek Anbesse, who has worked as a cabin cleaner for the last four years. “We have to look for a second job.”

“I have seven kids,” said Samson Yeshitla, who earns $7.25 working for G2 Secure Staff, a Texas-based contractor that provides Delta Air Lines with wheelchair agents and electric-cart drivers. “It’s hard to survive.”

Yeshitla is one of more than 300 parents working for poverty-level wages at the airport, according to Local 26’s report. Peggy Flanaganan, executive director of the Children’s Defense Fund-Minnesota, said increasing in the minimum wage would directly improve the lives of airport workers’ children, too.

“We know if we increase minimum wage to $9.50 by 2015, over 137,000 children will directly benefit,” she said, pointing to research by the Brookings Institution indicating a $1,000 increase in families’ incomes corresponds with tangibly improved educational outcomes for their children.

State Rep. Ryan Winkler, lead author of a bill to raise Minnesota’s minimum wage to $9.50 by 2015, also stood with airport workers. His bill, supported by the labor-backed Raise the Wage coalition, would increase wages for 360,000 Minnesotans, and boost purchasing power by $400 million throughout the state’s economy.

“It’s important to remember the economy is leaving behind a great many workers,” Winkler said. “Hard work should deliver somebody a decent quality of life. It’s about time we all start doing better.”

Local 26 already represents about 200 cleaning workers at MSP. Under the terms of their collective bargaining agreement, they earn, on average, $14 per hour with health benefits.

That’s why workers like Landau aren’t just fighting for an increase in the minimum wage; they’re also working to form a union.

“This is only the beginning,” Landau said. “We’ll continue to fight until we get justice.”

Airport workers Samson Yeshitla (left) and Misrek Anbesse join a press conference in support of raising the state's minimum wage outside Terminal 1.

Airport workers Samson Yeshitla (left) and Misrek Anbesse join a press conference in support of raising the state’s minimum wage outside Terminal 1.

Going against the grain, some small business owners back wage hike

Barb Johnson, owner of Lyle's Cafe in Winthrop, supports raising the minimum wage.

Barbara Johnson, owner of Lyle’s Cafe in Winthrop, supports raising the minimum wage.

Think the minimum-wage hike progressing through the Legislature is bad news for Minnesota’s small businesses? Think again.

A survey released last week indicates strong support among small business owners nationwide for raising the federal minimum wage and adjusting it annually to account for inflation.

Small business owners gathered at the Minnesota Capitol yesterday explained the surprising survey results. Barbara Johnson, owner of Lyle’s Cafe in Winthrop, said when low-wage workers see more money in their paychecks, they are more likely to spend it at local businesses like her café.

“It’s just common sense in the restaurant business that if people have more money in their pockets, they’re more likely to go out for lunch on their break or maybe take their family out for dinner once and a while,” Johnson said.

She and other business owners spoke at a press conference staged by a coalition of unions, non-profit organizations and faith groups backing a House bill that would increase the state’s minimum wage to $9.50 over three years, and tie it to inflation. The bill’s author, Rep. Ryan Winkler (DFL-Golden Valley), said 400,000 Minnesota workers would see a raise if the measure becomes law.

By participating in the event, Johnson and other small business owners would appear to flout the company line toed by powerful trade groups and business lobbyists fighting hard against Winkler’s bill. These groups claim a minimum-wage increase would disproportionately affect small businesses by forcing them to reduce their payrolls in order to absorb the added labor costs.

There’s just one problem with that argument: It’s not backed by economic research.

In a study released last summer, the National Employment Law Project found that two-thirds of low-wage workers are employed not by small businesses, but by large corporations that are highly profitable – and entirely capable of absorbing increased labor costs.

Indeed, each of the nation’s three largest low-wage employers – Wal-Mart, Yum! Brands (parent of Pizza Hut, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Taco Bell) and McDonalds – is turning profits “substantially higher” than its pre-recession levels, according to the NELP. And while they may argue it would be impossible to absorb the cost of higher wages for their lowest-paid employees, CEO pay at the three corporations remains healthier than ever.

The report, entitled “Big Business, Corporate Profits and the Minimum Wage,” concludes: “Contrary to what critics sometimes suggest, the majority of the impact of any increase in the minimum wage will … be felt by large companies and corporations rather than small mom-and-pop establishments.”

What’s more, when large employers like Wal-Mart and McDonalds raise their workers’ wages, it boosts the buying power of a group of consumers least likely – or able – to save their wages for a rainy day. The Minnesota-based JOBS NOW Coalition reports that every $1 increase in the minimum wage boosts consumer spending in the average low-wage worker’s household by $2,800 over the following year.

That’s a ripple effect felt by businesses like Lyle’s Café. “If more people are spending more money, that’s great news for my bottom line,” Johnson said.

So why all the fuss from trade groups and chambers of commerce in advance of a minimum-wage hike?

“Employers complain a lot during these debates,” John Schmitt, a senior economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, said during a forum on minimum wage hosted earlier this year by JOBS NOW and the University of Minnesota’s Labor Education Service.

“They say one thing beforehand, and what they do after (a minimum wage increase) is they learn to live with it,” Schmitt said. “We don’t see any decrease in employment.”