Strike ends as Hazelden nurses ratify historic contract with safety guarantees

Members of the Minnesota Nurses Association vote on the proposed contract with Hazelden.

Nurses ended their strike at the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation’s Center City campus this week, settling a first contract that, union members say, will address concerns that sparked their historic organizing campaign.

Members of the Minnesota Nurses Association’s bargaining unit – about 60 nurses in all – voted to ratify the contract today. Union negotiators reached a tentative agreement with Hazelden on Tuesday.

That brought a halt to picketing outside the prestigious addiction-treatment facility that began July 15 and persisted through steamy temperatures, smoky air and gridlock at the bargaining table.

That resolve sent a strong message to management, members of the bargaining team said.

“It was taxing physically, financially, mentally and sometimes spiritually, but the best thing about it was we were really able to bond on that line,” Anne Coleman, a registered nurse at Hazelden for the last two years, said. “And not only did we bond, but we were able to have our voices heard, which we know has not been the case consistently for years and years – especially around security and safety.

“This was historic, and I’m really proud of our team.”

Indeed, nurses at the Chisago County campus became the first anywhere across Hazelden Betty Ford’s system to win a union contract, and one of their key gains – providing staff with panic buttons – will extend to nurses and other caregivers nationwide, veteran registered nurse Jody Burton said.

“It’s going to be in California, Chicago, Florida – it’s a huge win,” Burton said. “From Day 1, they were like, ‘No, this (safety language) is never going to be part of your contract.’ But we won it, and we won it for everyone. We’re a powerful team.”

The contract establishes a firm deadline for management to implement panic buttons and other workplace safety measures. Nurses also pushed Hazelden to staff their rural facility with security or safety personnel, and the employer committed to “a contractual pathway to implement safety staff,” according to MNA.

Safety emerged as a top issue in negotiations for union members, who pointed to the increased abuse of highly potent drugs, like fentanyl, among their patients. MNA pulled public data that found county sheriff’s deputies responded to nearly three calls each week, on average, to the Center City campus between Jan. 1, 2025, and July 19, 2026.

Coleman called the contract “a move in the right direction that I don’t think would have happened if we had not gone on strike,” and she pledged that the union would “keep promoting and advocating for safety protocols to help us do our jobs.”

“And it’s not just about the nurses,” she added. “I think about the techs who have been in verbal and physical altercations. I think about the other nurses who have been kicked, punched, spit on. I think about the other patients who are terrified by a psychosis event. In a highly emotional, stressful environment, there should be better safeguards, and this contract is leading that way.”

The contract also delivers economic gains and puts nurses’ health-insurance benefits in writing, protecting against the kind of sudden, arbitrary cuts that many Hazelden employees experienced two years ago – and provided the spark for nurses to form a union with MNA.

Additionally, nurses gained recognition of their full bargaining unit, including casual and on-call nurses. Hazelden fought to divide the unit during their organizing drive, forcing two separate union elections, both of which were successful.

Now, Burton said, nurses are eager to get back to work and back to their patients. The financial strain of going on strike was significant for many union members, she added.

“But you could never tell by the way people showed up on the line with their family, shouting and screaming and digging in their feet,” Burton said. “We would have fought longer if we’d have had to.”

– Michael Moore, UA editor

Hazelden nurses ‘not backing down’ as strike enters second week

Nurses speak with press after bargaining with Hazelden in St. Paul Tuesday.

Nurses bargaining a first union contract with the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation launched an open-ended strike July 15 at the renowned addiction-treatment facility in Center City, and their picket line remains up after two bargaining sessions this week.

Members of the Minnesota Nurses Association (MNA) voted to authorize a strike nearly a year into negotiations. Nurses have filed multiple unfair-labor-practice complaints during that time, accusing Hazelden of making unilateral changes to working conditions without bargaining and attempting to prevent workers from protected union activity.

But nurses also say that, at the bargaining table, Hazelden has refused to address the issues behind their vote to unionize in January 2025, including workplace safety, competitive wages and benefits, and improved working conditions that they need to care for patients with increasingly complex needs.

“We keep coming with a new solution that they’re immediately shutting down,” Jody Burton, a registered nurse with nearly 11 years of experience at Hazelden, said. “We come with a different solution; they shut it down. We’ve been doing this for almost a year now, and they don’t ever bring a solution to the table.”

Burton and other members of MNA’s bargaining team have been traveling to negotiations in St. Paul – nearly an hour’s drive from their workplace in Center City – at Hazelden’s request.

Back in Chisago County, members of the 60-person bargaining unit are keeping an active picket line up at the intersection of U.S. Highway 8 and Pleasant Valley Road, near the entrance to Hazelden’s main campus. (Support is welcome on the picket line; follow MNA’s social media for updates.)

“We literally have had people on the lines in the hottest days, in bad quality air,” Burton said. “We haven’t budged. We are still strong, still energized, and we will still be there every day that (management) are not willing to negotiate because we are fighting for a reason – for our patients to have a safe place to change.”

Hazelden nurses picket in Center City.

But safety has been a sticking point in contract negotiations between MNA and Hazelden.

At a time when healthcare workers nationwide are expressing concerns about workplace safety, Hazelden nurses are increasingly treating patients under the influence of highly potent drugs like fentanyl. Nurses say the de-escalation tactics that they are trained to use when a patient becomes violent are insufficient alone.

In bargaining, nurses have floated proposals like round-the-clock security, panic buttons and minimum staffing levels to protect patients, caregivers and visitors. Hazelden has responded that a greater security presence is incompatible with its care environment, according to union members.

“Some of us who have been at Hazelden for decades, we’ve seen a shift in the patients that we take in, and with that shift comes a lot of violence,” Burton said. “We may not have needed those (protections) five, seven or 10 years ago, but we need them now.”

But on Day 1 of the strike, nurses were quick to notice that security personnel crossed their picket line to support replacement nurses – “the same security protections nurses have been bargaining for over the past year but still have not received,” bargaining team member Ann Coleman said.

“Temporary nursing staff have security, and we don’t. Let that sink in,” Coleman added. “Safety isn’t a luxury, and it’s not optional – and it shouldn’t be something nurses have to fight for.”

MNA and Hazelden are scheduled to resume bargaining tomorrow, and they have another session scheduled July 28. Coleman said the strike won’t end until management comes ready to “bargain with purpose.”

“We’re not backing down,” she added.

– Michael Moore, UA editor

Nurses picket as Hazelden Betty Ford drags out first-contract talks

MNA members picket outside Hazelden Betty Ford’s facility in Center City.

Nurses bargaining a first union contract with the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation held informational picketing June 2 at the renowned addiction-treatment facility in Center City, looking to raise awareness of their safety and staffing concerns.

Members of the Minnesota Nurses Association had hoped Hazelden administrators would take a collaborative approach to addressing the issues behind their vote to unionize in January 2025.

But those hopes have fizzled over 16 months of mostly unproductive talks.

“A lot of things that we propose, they’ll propose back that they don’t need it to be written out,” Cara Bergner, a registered nurse in Hazelden’s detox unit, said on the picket line. “They just want it up to management’s discretion, which kind of defeats the whole purpose of the contract.

“I think their hopes are that if they put it off, we’ll get tired and give up. But I don’t see that being the case.”

Anne Coleman, another registered nurse in the detox unit, said nurses are bargaining for changes that will make their jobs more sustainable – and they’re doing it because they believe in the Hazelden Betty Ford mission.

“We take people in a crisis situation who, a lot of the time, come in very broken, and I just love to see them get their lives back, to get the confidence and light back in their eyes,” Coleman said. “I love to see them heal.

“We wouldn’t be here if we didn’t love the mission, the patients and the many things that Hazelden has done for the community and nationwide. But the healthcare system itself is broken, and, unfortunately, it’s trickled down to Hazelden.”

As the rate of violence against healthcare workers rises nationwide, Hazelden nurses are increasingly treating patients under the influence of highly potent drugs like fentanyl. Union members say de-escalation tactics, which they are trained to use when a patient becomes violent, are insufficient alone.

“We’re bringing in higher-acuity, more severe cases of people who have mental-health issues and severe addictions,” Bergner said. “We don’t have any other safeguards (besides de-escalation) and any true, straightforward protocols for staff members’ safety.”

In bargaining, nurses have floated proposals like round-the-clock security, panic buttons and minimum staffing levels. Some units, Bergner and Coleman said, have just one nurse on the floor at times, leaving staff overwhelmed.

Perhaps predictably, an increasing number of Hazelden nurses are leaving the bedside. Turnover has affected about a third of MNA’s 60-person bargaining unit of registered and licensed practical nurses, according to the union.

Coleman said factors behind the attrition include stagnant wages over the last two years, recent benefit cuts and management’s unwillingness to agree to measures that would make nurses feel safer and more supported on the job.

Newly hired nurses are leaving too. “They come here,” Bergner said, “and before they really get a love for the job, they’re like, ‘This space is crazy.’”

For nurses who remain, the turnover creates more short staffing and extends their shifts. Coleman said she has worked as many as 16 hours straight.

“I’m happy to do it because I want my patients to have the support they need and the safety,” she said. “However, it’s not sustainable.

“We’ve got so many experienced nurses who really, truly care for our patients that we’ve lost. All that we’re asking is for Hazelden to work with us.”

– Michael Moore, Union Advocate editor

Quick fix for staffing crisis not enough, hospital nurses warn

One day after Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announced a $40 million plan to bolster hospital staffing with temporary hires, long-serving nurses from many of the state’s hospitals met with state and federal lawmakers to make clear that the crisis demands more than a quick fix.

The virtual town hall Jan. 13 drew over 200 participants, with members of the Minnesota Nurses Association logging on to sound the alarm about dangerously low staffing levels in their hospitals.

Many pinned the blame on administrators for ignoring signs of trouble well before the COVID-19 pandemic began. “This problem was not created overnight,” Allina nurse Vanessa Soldo-Jones said.

Without meaningful action to change the way hospital systems conduct their business in Minnesota, nurses warned, staffing shortfalls will only worsen, threatening the state’s reputation for quality patient care.

“We are tired of delivering substandard care and putting patients at increased risk due to lean staffing,” United Hospital nurse Ali Marcanti said. “Hospital administration has been cutting back on staffing year after year, with staffing grid changes that take very little patient acuity into account.”

Marcanti, Soldo-Jones and other union members offered a series of dire reports from the front lines of a pandemic that has strained Minnesota’s health care system. They described treating patients in hallways, leaving patients’ hygiene needs unmet and being tasked with transporting bodies to trailers serving as makeshift morgues.

“There is very often a list in the double digits of patients who are waiting for a bed to open up,” Abbott Northwestern intensive care nurse Kelly Anaas said. “But we don’t have enough nurses to staff all the ICU beds.”

Sue Schroeder, a mental health nurse who works with adolescents at Abbott Northwestern, said violent incidents in her unit have increased since administrators altered staffing minimums for nurses and support staff last spring.

Nine of her colleagues, Schroeder said, have sustained injuries severe enough to require extended medical leave, but administrators have given no indication that they intend to reverse course on staffing levels. “This is unconscionable,” she said.

Nurses described a snowball effect to the staffing crisis; the worse it gets, the more likely others are to leave the profession. Doreen McIntyre, a nurse at Children’s in Minneapolis, said she doesn’t blame colleagues who, after a wage cut, furloughs and two rounds of layoffs, decided to walk.

“Every day I work, nurses are making plans for the future, and the future does not sometimes include being a nurse anymore,” she said. “I also have had many days where I have weighed my options also.”

Burnout, Marcanti added, doesn’t begin to describe how nurses are feeling. And they aren’t alone. Weeks earlier, members of SEIU Healthcare Minnesota who work in hospitals held a similar event to voice concerns about their short staffing in their ranks.

“Every day we go home after a full, 8- to 16-hour shift of providing substandard care, it takes a little piece of us,” Marcanti said. “Every day we walk out that door knowing we could have done so much more for you if we were adequately staffed.”

In addition to their exhaustion and frustration, hospital nurses on the call expressed a shared perception that administrators have been alarmingly out of touch with what’s happening in their units. And it’s not for nurses’ lack of speaking up.

Nurses at Children’s Hospital, McIntire said, filed over 3,000 reports of unsafe staffing in 2021. Abbott Northwestern nurse Adiam Midekssa said she was sent home from her shift and disciplined for refusing to take more patients than she felt she could safely manage.

“I requested that the assignment be modified so I could provide safe patient care, but I was denied that and sent home,” Midekssa said. “Our goal is to keep our patients and ourselves safe, and I feel like things need to change so we can do that.”

The town hall meeting came a day after Gov. Tim Walz announced the state would spend $40 million in federal relief funds to reinforce staffing – primarily among nurses – in Minnesota hospitals. The funding will stretch across 60-day period.

The move was accompanied by calls from some lawmakers to allow nurses with licenses from other states to practice in Minnesota – a move union nurses warned would undermine the high quality of care Minnesotans expect.

“There is no surplus of nurses in other states,” MNA President Mary Turner, an ICU nurse at North Memorial, said. “We are training more than enough nursing students to meet the need here in Minnesota, but CEO’s have made our hospitals into places that push our nurses away from the bedside to serve the bottom line.”

Instead of lowering standards, union members said, hospitals and lawmakers should be doing more to retain registered nurses and bring those who have left the profession back into the fold. Equitable compensation, more training opportunities and greater flexibility, nurses said, should be part of the solution.

“What I’d like to see from the hospital administrators is a little more recognition of our humanity and our limits,” Anaas said. “The stresses that every single person … is living through as a result of this pandemic are happening to nurses too – and then we go to work.”

The solution must also include taking nurses’ concerns about safe staffing and quality care to heart, said Sen. Erin Murphy, herself a registered nurse. Lawmakers and hospital administrators too often have tuned out those concerns, despite work stoppages, lobbying campaigns and thousands of reports documenting unsafe staffing, Murphy said.

“For more than a decade you have been telling us that staffing is inadequate in the hospitals in Minnesota,” the St. Paul DFLer said. “You have brought to bear countless, thousands of unsafe staffing forms. You have come and testified. You have asked for relief. Part of the reason we are experiencing what we are experiencing now is because the hospitals were never prepared for this level of crisis.”

Insurance plan trustee advises members ‘go elsewhere for care’ during Allina strike

web.AllinaStrikeDay1-5

Nurses picket outside United Hospital in St. Paul, one of five Allina Health facilities where members of MNA have been on strike since Labor Day.

The president of a major Minnesota union sent a letter this week to members enrolled in its health insurance plans urging them to “go elsewhere for health care” during the Allina strike.

Jennifer Christensen, president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1189, cited concerns about “quality control” and patient safety at five Allina Health facilities in the Twin Cities where members of the Minnesota Nurses Association have been on strike since Sept. 5: Abbott Northwestern, Mercy, United and Unity hospitals and Phillips Eye Institute.

[Click here to view the full letter.]

As it did during nurses’ seven-day strike in June, Allina has contracted replacement nurses from across the country to fill in for the 4,700 union members who regularly staff its facilities. The changeover was rocky in June, prompting patients and hospital staff to file about 40 complaints with state regulators, according to MNA.

Christensen, who serves as a trustee of two multi-employer health insurance plans that cover 7,000 people, questioned whether replacement nurses could uphold the high standards set by union nurses, or whether Allina’s facilities have “become so overwhelmed with so many new replacement nurses that quality care is no longer guaranteed.”

Local 1189 leaders say they plan to invite other unions that sponsor Taft Hartley plans to join them in advising members to consider alternatives to Allina until the provider gets serious about negotiating with its nurses.

Nurses approve contracts with five Twin Cities hospital systems

web.MNAvote-scene

Nurses from five Twin Cities hospital systems voted yesterday to ratify union contracts that will protect their pension and health benefits and provide 2 percent raises in each of the next three years.

The new contracts won’t go into effect for more than four months. Negotiations between the Minnesota Nurses Association and the hospitals – Children’s, Fairview, HealthEast, North Memorial and Methodist – proceeded quickly after the two sides agreed to wages-only bargaining.

The process appeared similarly routine for nurses filing in and out of the northeast Minneapolis hotel where the MNA staged balloting. But for one Fairview Southdale nurse, casting her ballot was a selfie-worthy experience.

“I took tons of pictures and sent them to my mom,” Emma Sonney said after participating in her first union-contract vote. “I’d never been a union member before I took this job two months ago. So it’s pretty exciting.”

Fairview Southdale nurse Emma Sonney, who moved to Minnesota from Wisconsin last year, casts a ballot in a contract vote for the first time in her life.

Fairview Southdale nurse Emma Sonney, who moved to Minnesota from Wisconsin last year, casts a ballot in a contract vote for the first time in her life.

A fifth-generation nurse born and raised in Wisconsin, Sonney relocated to Minnesota last year after reading an article that ranked the state’s working conditions for nurses second in the U.S.

The move paid off when Sonney landed a job in Southdale’s perianesthesia unit. She was surprised to find nursing scrubs and a locker provided, as well as supervisors who insisted she take breaks and eight-hour shifts that ended on schedule.

Already, her wages are higher than her father’s, even though he’s been working as a registered nurse since finishing his military service.

For Sonney, the choice between working in a strong union state like Minnesota or a Right to Work state like Wisconsin is an easy one.

“There’s no advocacy in Wisconsin anymore, whether you’re a nurse or someone else,” she said. “When I get to work, I want to know I’m going to be at least somewhat protected. That’s what a union contract provides.”

Strong union contracts protect patients too, MNA President Mary Turner said, by empowering nurses to speak up when they see conditions that undermine patient care, like unsafe staffing levels.

Safe staffing was the biggest sticking point in negotiations between nurses and Twin Cities hospitals in 2010, when MNA members briefly went on strike for safe patient care. Nurses eventually won contract language establishing site-based, labor-management committees focused on the issue.

“We really thought our hospitals were going to step up and work with us on staffing,” Turner said. “We’ve been trying to move things forward in our collaborative committees, but things seem to be only getting worse.”

Safe patient care remains the top priority, Turner said, but nurses are using their collective voice to advocate for safe staffing levels at the Capitol rather than at the negotiating table. Last year, nurses turned in more than 2,000 “Concern for Safe Staffing” forms to state regulators during the union’s annual lobbying day.

Meanwhile, the shift in focus has freed MNA negotiators to focus on protecting and building on the benefits and working conditions that make Minnesota a destination for job-seeking nurses like Sonney.

“Everything in our contract, nurses before us have worked extremely hard to get,” Turner said. “We don’t take that lightly.”

The newly approved contracts cover about 7,000 nurses in the Twin Cities. MNA also represents about 5,000 nurses who work in facilities owned by Allina Health, which opted out of metro-wide talks.

Negotiations between nurses and Allina management will begin at a later date, according to the union.

As reports of understaffing soar, Minnesota plummets in hospital safety rankings

nursespicket-web22Minnesota plummeted in a nationwide ranking of hospital safety released yesterday, but that came as no surprise to nurses, whose reports of unsafe staffing incidents in hospitals statewide have doubled over the last 12 months.

Minnesota fell from 15th to 32nd in the Hospital Safety Score rankings, based on the percentage of hospitals that receive an “A” grade in each state. Grades are determined using data collected from hospitals, including errors, injuries, accidents, infections and 28 other key patient safety metrics, and they reflect a hospital’s “overall performance in keeping patients safe from preventable harm and medical errors.”

Just 18 percent of Minnesota hospitals that participated in reporting received an “A” grade, and 17 of 38 hospitals received “C” or “D” grades. Nationwide, 31 percent of reporting hospitals scored an “A” rating for patient safety.

Linda Hamilton, president of the Minnesota Nurses Association, said the state’s hospitals should be leading – not lagging – when it comes to safe patient care.

“Nurses in Minnesota are saddened that patients in our hospitals are not receiving the care they need,” Hamilton said. “Hospitals need to assure patients that the care they receive isn’t being compromised by financial decisions that affect patient safety.”

The statewide nurses union has seen a major uptick in reports of unsafe staffing since Oct. 27, 2014. The 2,765 Concern for Safe Staffing Forms filed by nurses over that time period is more than double the number filed in the previous 12-month period.

Nurses file Concern for Safe Staffing forms with the MNA to track incidents of hospitals not scheduling enough nurses to meet patients’ needs. Hamilton, a bedside nurse at Children’s Hospital in Minneapolis, said the reports reflect “only the most critical of situations.”

“Understaffing patient care is dangerous,” she said. “That is why we speak out by calling our managers and by filling out these reports. When these nurse staffing situations become more frequent, patients pay the price.”

The Hospital Safety Score rankings are published twice a year by the Leapfrog Group, an independent nonprofit organization focused on hospital transparency.

Staffing, safety concerns prompt HealthEast officers’ union drive

Kyle McGinn speaks at a press conference outside Bethesda Hospital in St. Paul, where he works as a security officer.

Kyle McGinn speaks at a press conference outside Bethesda Hospital in St. Paul, where he works as a security officer. McGinn is a leader in HealthEast officers’ efforts to organize a union.

 

There is safety in numbers and strength in a union. Security officers at HealthEast hospitals are organizing to achieve both.

Officers say they’ve been warning management for years about dangerously low staffing levels among their ranks. HealthEast usually keeps just two security officers on duty at each of its four East Metro hospitals – unless someone calls in sick.

Those concerns fell mostly on deaf ears, officers say, even after nurses at St. John’s Hospital, a HealthEast campus in Maplewood, were brutally assaulted last year. Frustrated, an overwhelming majority of HealthEast’s 45 officers realized organizing a union “is the most effective way to make our voice heard in the workplace,” Bethesda security officer Kyle McGinn said.

“We’ve had violent patients lash out at staff,” McGinn said. “I’ve had gunshots go off and shootings take place within a block of the hospital.

“Security officers want to be able to provide the safest environment possible for patients, families, visitors and other staff members. We feel with the current staffing levels – and the training and equipment we’re given at this moment – we’re not able to do that.”

Bethesda Hospital President Cathy Barr rejects a request from Kyle McGinn (L) that HealthEast recognize a majority of officers' request to form a union.

Bethesda Hospital President Cathy Barr rejects a request from Kyle McGinn (L) that HealthEast accept officers’ petition to form a union.

A public campaign

McGinn and his fellow officers began organizing a union with AFSCME Council 5 earlier this year. Yesterday, backed by elected officials and supporters in the labor community, they visited Bethesda President Catherine Barr’s office to request management recognize their union and engage in a dialogue about their staffing concerns.

After waiting 20 minutes for HealthEast’s director of labor relations to arrive, Barr declined to recognize the union and refused to discuss staffing.

Officers pledged to keep fighting for recognition. But winning a union, Council 5 organizers warned, will require more public pressure on HealthEast than is typically the case during an organizing drive.

That’s because the National Labor Relations Act prohibits security officers and other “guards” from voting to join a union that already represents — or could potentially represent — other workers at the same employer. Because AFSCME Council 5’s 43,000 members statewide include health care workers (although none at Bethesda), the security guards cannot petition for a union election.

HealthEast can recognize the officers’ union voluntarily, however. That’s the approach St. Paul City Council members, Ramsey County commissioners and other elected officials urged the hospital system to take in letters delivered in advance of the officers’ request for recognition.

“These are the people responsible for caring for us,” St. Paul City Council Member Dave Thune said at a press conference outside Bethesda. “We would encourage Bethesda to recognize the union and work with the employees. The City of St. Paul works with unions all the time, and it’s considered a positive. I think it will be a positive for Bethesda as well.”

AFSCME Council 5 Executive Director Eliot Seide (R) talks with HealthEast security officers Joe Misencik (L) and Jeff Perry.

AFSCME Council 5 Executive Director Eliot Seide (R) talks with HealthEast security officers Joe Misencik (L) and Jeff Perry.

‘Stick together’

Other HealthEast employees, who rely on security officers to keep them safe at work, agreed with Thune. Members of the Service Employees International Union, the Minnesota Nurses Association and Operating Engineers Local 70 supported the officers’ request.

Nursing assistants Brandon Nagel and Haley Gould stuck around the hospital after finishing the night shift to stand behind officers McGinn, Joe Misencik and Jeff Perry as they delivered the petition to management.

“We constantly have traffic coming in and out,” said Nagel, a steward with SEIU Healthcare Minnesota. “With only one security officer at night, if they’re in the middle of dealing with something, we’re on our own. There are times when I would love to have backup or security (during a behavior emergency), but I’m waiting 10, 15 minutes.”

Council 5 Executive Director Eliot Seide urged officers, “Stick together, hang together and we’ll win together.”

Unity Hospital workers go union after voting under new NLRB rules

Screen Shot 2015-07-13 at 6.41.48 PM

(photo courtesy SEIU Healthcare MN)

About 350 workers at Unity Hospital in Fridley voted yesterday to join SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, the union announced today. The new bargaining unit includes nursing assistants, dietary aides, environmental services aides, patient care technicians and other positions.

Over 59 percent of workers voted in favor of forming a union. It was the first major election in the region conducted under new rules established by the National Labor Relations Board in April, according to SEIU.

Part of an effort to modernize and streamline union organizing elections, the NLRB’s new rules allow workers’ petitions for elections to be filed online, consolidate the post-election appeals process and require equal access to voter contact lists for management and the union.

Management has long exploited the NLRB appeals process to drag out organizing elections, hoping to kill pro-union momentum, and business groups are challenging the NLRB rule changes in court.

Barb Shoemaker, a patient care tech from Anoka, said the process was fair for both Unity Hospital and its workers, who wanted to take an up-or-down vote on whether to form their union and move on with the results.

“With the changes in the union election rules, we were able to have a vote on whether we wanted to join SEIU without overwhelming interference,” Shoemaker said. “Even with the new rules, they tried to scare people out of voting yes and even attempted to stop people from engaging in protected union activity, but I am glad that under new NLRB guidelines we didn’t have to wait weeks longer to have our vote. By voting yes to form our union, our voice will finally be heard.”

The new unit will now begin bargaining their first contract with Unity, an Allina-owned hospital. Tania Logacz, a nursing assistant from Coon Rapids, said better patient care is at the top of Unity workers’ list of priorities.

“Care giving is getting tougher, but management only considers the total number of patients when setting staffing ratios, not the acuity of care needed,” Logacz said. “This has led to many more employee injuries and staff are being burnt out.

“By voting to form a union, we showed that we the employees do count and we’re going to look out for patients’ safety and our own safety.”

The election victory was a decade in the making for several pro-union workers, including Kathy Sodman, a health unit coordinator from Ramsey.

“As a long-time employee, I always have hoped that Unity was as dedicated to my future as much as I am dedicated to Unity’s,” she said. “But the reality is that management views us as easily expendable even through all my years of hard work for the hospital.

“I’ve been part of previous attempts over the past 10 years to organize a union at Unity and today we finally succeeded, and we will be heard!”

SEIU Healthcare Minnesota unites more than 42,000 health care and long-term care workers in hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and home care throughout the state of Minnesota.

Attack on Maplewood nurses prompts legislation to prevent future assaults

Maplewood Police Chief Paul Schnell listens to RN Mary McGiven's testimony in a Senate committee hearing.

Maplewood Police Chief Paul Schnell listens to RN Mary McGiven’s testimony in a Senate committee hearing.

Maplewood Police Chief Paul Schnell warned senators on the Health, Human Services and Housing Committee that the video footage he would show in their hearing yesterday, taken during a patient’s attack on nurses at St. John’s Hospital last year, was disturbing and violent.

The footage showed a typical hospital workstation that, in an instant and without warning, became a frenzied scene, as the patient chased hospital workers, swinging a metal bar he stripped from an IV stand.

The Nov. 2 attack made headlines – and left one nurse with a collapsed lung, fractured the wrists of another and caused minor injuries to two other nurses.

Yesterday at the Capitol, members of the Minnesota Nurses Association offered their support for a bill to prevent future attacks against health care workers.

The Violence against Health Care Workers Bill, presented by chief author Sen. Chuck Wiger (DFL-Maplewood) at the committee hearing, would require hospitals to prepare for violent incidents by providing adequate training, staffing and security to health care workers who are faced with workplace violence – or risk losing their license to operate.

“It should be mandatory that we have that plan, and that we review it and rehearse it regularly,” Nora Jordan, a nurse at Sanford Hospital in Bemidji, told the committee. “That way we’re not just reacting, we’re acting.”

Jordan and other MNA members at the hearing asked lawmakers to take action to address an increase in the number of violent incidents – known in hospitals as “code greens” – in their workplaces.

“I like to think I’m pretty tough, but believe me, when I hear code green, I cringe,” critical-care nurse Mary McGiven told the committee.

Over the course of 19 years at Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park, McGiven said, she has seen an increase in “code greens.” The last came after a patient grew increasingly agitated and began verbally abusing, kicking and spitting at staff attempting to provide him with care.

“A code green was called on this particular patient when he punched me right in the face,” McGiven said.

“I have been spit at, urinated on, kicked, scratched and punched in the face and chest,” she said. “I have suffered multiple bruises, sprained wrists and several shoulder injuries. And these are not rare occurrences. These happen every day in the hospital.”

But according to the Department of Justice, most non-fatal violent workplace crimes go reported to the police. That’s why Wiger’s bill, which is also progressing through the House, would require the state to set up an electronic “violence prevention database” that health care workers could access to report violence or abuse.

Chief Schnell, who provides training to Maplewood-area health care and social workers in dealing with aggressive behavior, said there were any number of reasons a health care worker might not report an assault, from fear of being blamed by supervisors to feeling such attacks are “just part of the job.”

“I’ve asked workers what they would recommend to a patient who reported being abused in the workplace or in their home, and almost always their response is, ‘I would tell them to report it,’” Schnell said. “What’s interesting is when health care workers describe incidents in their workplaces where they’ve been abused, they may not always follow their own advice.”

Schnell likened the data-collection provision of Wiger’s bill to the Jeanne Clery Act, which requires colleges to keep and disclose information about crime on and near their campuses. He credited the law with heightening awareness about campus crime and fostering important, if sometimes uncomfortable discussions on campuses across the country.

“Violence against health care workers is unacceptable,” Wiger said. “These hardworking people are tasked with the health and safety of their patients; it’s time to make sure they have the same protections.”