Expo shows off 49ers’ training center, apprenticeship program

Construction vendors showcase their newest heavy equipment at the New Iron Expo April 3-5.

HINCKLEY – Dominic Bergerson skipped school on a Thursday morning to play video games and drive heavy equipment around in the mud, but the 17-year-old wasn’t playing hooky.

He was exploring career opportunities.

Bergerson was among some 1,000 people who attended the New Iron Expo during its three-day run April 3-5 at Operating Engineers Local 49’s training center. The event featured over 100 vendors, who allowed prospective operators, journey-level workers, contractors and industry insiders to kick the tires on dozens of the newest heavy equipment models.

“I’m trying to figure out what I’m supposed to be doing with my life,” Bergerson said in between turns on a backhoe video simulator. “This is a good way to start.”

Reaching “future 49ers” like Bergerson, Business Manager Glen Johnson said, was the union’s primary objective in hosting an expo for the second time in three years.

“This expo was to promote the training that we do and this training center – and the opportunity to be able to get into the Operating Engineers and have a career,” he added.

Six-year-old Jayden Maslow and his dad, Roman, an Operating Engineer from Braham, push some dirt  together during the New Iron Expo. Jayden skipped school to attend the event.

The 49ers’ training grounds sprawl across 400 acres of land east of Hinckley. The $10 million facility opened in 2006, and an estimated 5,000 people pass through each year, from apprentices working on their credits to journey-level members keeping their certifications up to date.

The union takes pride in keeping the training center a state-of-the-art facility, so that its graduates are ready to meet the industry’s labor needs – and equipped with the skills to adapt as the industry changes. Local 49 recently invested in GPS technology, increasingly embedded into heavy equipment, and it added a pipeline training area with a grant from its international union.

The facility itself reflects the kind of “smart build” technology at the cutting edge of the construction industry. A geothermal energy field on campus powers the training center’s buildings, producing enough energy to sell back to the electric grid as a backup source – an arrangement that allows the local to keep its energy bills near zero.

“We’ll be here forever,” Johnson said of the training center. “The facility was built like a college campus, and it’s built to last.”

During the expo, Local 49 business agents led bus tours that snaked through the different training grounds, where apprentices get hands-on experience operating cranes, pile drivers, bulldozers, excavators and other machines.

Simulators inside Local 49’s training center offered an opportunity to work on technique before climbing inside the real equipment. “It’s all muscle memory,” Local 49 business agent Darrell Miller said. “With enough repetition, it comes.”

“Operating engineers aren’t getting born; we’ve got to make them,” business agent Will Thomssen told a bus full of visitors. “That’s our job as a local union, and this is about letting our members know and our contractors know how we do it.”

At the end of the bus tour was the big show: fields bustling with heavy equipment as far as the eye could see. Vendor representatives stood ready to show off their products or give a quick tutorial to anyone interested in climbing into the operator’s chair.

“The industry is manufacturing new equipment and attachments and all sorts of stuff every day,” Johnson said. “Where do you get to go to see a lot of it in one place?”

For Bergerson, the 17-year-old skipping school, that was exactly the appeal. After setting a high score on the backhoe simulator, he headed out to try the real thing.

“Right when I hopped in that door,” he said, “it was like, ‘Woah, this is a lot tougher than I thought.’”

Construction jobs get bipartisan support at Capitol rally

State lawmakers from both parties touted their proposals to put union tradespeople to work during a rally today on the Capitol steps, organized by the Minnesota State Building and Construction Trades Council.

The rally capped the council’s annual lobbying day, which saw Carpenters, Laborers, Operating Engineers and other union tradespeople meeting with their elected officials and urging support for jobs-creating investments, including Gov. Mark Dayton’s proposed $1.5 billion public works bill.

The governor’s bonding proposal would put an estimated 22,950 people to work on more than 200 projects statewide, investing in public colleges and universities, housing, water-treatment facilities and more.

But Dayton warned tradespeople that opponents will try to scale back his jobs bill.

“They’re going to try to pare it back,” he said. “They’re going to pick a number … and say we can’t go above that. They’re going to leave jobs on the table. So ask them to justify why a number is more important than putting people to work.”

Building Trades unions rally on the Capitol steps, with semi trailers from Laborers Local 563 and Operating Engineers Local 49 serving as a backdrop.

 

While Dayton and other DFLers called for investments in infrastructure and transportation, Republican leaders remained mostly silent on those issues. Instead, they offered support for legislation that would shift jobs-creating projects in the private sector, stalled over environmental concerns, out of neutral.

House Speaker Kurt Daudt and Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka pledged to send the governor a bill approving Enbridge’s Line 3 oil pipeline and another that would ease environmental hurdles faced by mining companies on the state’s Iron Range.

“My hope is that this is bipartisan,” Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, a Republican from Nisswa, said. “At the end of the day, frankly, for Minnesota to be successful, Republicans and Democrats have got to figure out a way to work together, focus on the things that everybody benefits from. If we do that, we all win.”

Although most lawmakers talked jobs, Senate Minority Leader Tom Bakk, a carpenter from Cook, held up his union card and urged tradespeople to stay vigilant against attacks on their wages and collective bargaining rights.

“You don’t have to look too far … to see what happened in Wisconsin when labor got a little complacent,” Bakk said, pointing to Republican-backed legislation that eliminated prevailing wage and project labor agreements in the state, as well as a “right-to-work” law that weakened unions’ bargaining power. “We’ve got to keep the heat on, keep building relationships with those people who represent us.”

Mahtomedi forum to weigh all sides of Sandpiper debate

SanpiperMainlineRIP19Nov2014A forum in Mahtomedi next month will size up the proposed Sandpiper Pipeline, and all sides of the debate will be represented, including organized labor.

River Valley Action will sponsor the forum, entitled “Mixing Oil and Water? Perspectives on the Sandpiper Oil Pipeline,” from 7 to 8:30 p.m. April 13 at White Bear Unitarian Universalist Church, 328 Maple Street.

Sandpiper is Enbridge Energy’s proposed $2.5 oil pipeline across northern Minnesota, currently under review by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. If approved, the pipeline would link the oil-rich Bakken region of North Dakota with Superior, Wis. – and create an estimated 1,500 construction jobs.

The proposal has drawn opposition from some environmentalist groups, but the Minnesota Building and Construction Trades Council supports the pipeline, arguing it will ease congestion in the state’s rail system, reduce the risk of rail accidents in highly populated areas and boost northern Minnesota’s struggling economy.

At the forum, Deborah Pile of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission will provide an overview of the project and the review process, then moderate a discussion among panelists representing Enbridge Energy, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the environmental group Friends of the Headwaters and Local 49 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, a union supporting the project.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will be encouraged to contact decision makers and let them know of their concerns and expectations.

River Valley Action is a group for citizens of the St. Croix Valley area who value a healthy and informed civic community. The nonpartisan group is “associated with labor unions, nonprofit organizations and faith communities,” and it focuses on public policy at the state and local levels.

For more information go to www.RiverValleyAction.org.

Minnesota unions make case for Sandpiper oil pipeline

Phillip Wallace, a representative of the United Association of Pipeliners Local 798, testifies at the public hearing on the proposed Sandpiper project.

Phillip Wallace of the United Association of Pipeliners Local 798 weighs in on the proposed Sandpiper project.

A series of five public hearings on a proposed oil pipeline through Minnesota opened in St. Paul yesterday, and members of several Building Trades unions stepped forward to support the $2.5 billion venture, projected to create 1,500 construction jobs.

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is collecting public testimony at sites across the state this week regarding the Sandpiper pipeline, which would transport crude oil from North Dakota’s booming Bakken region to terminals in Clearbrook and Superior, Wis.

Union members like David LaBorde of Duluth-based Teamsters Local 346 touted the jobs Sandpiper would create for northern Minnesota workers and the potential boost for the area’s struggling economy.

“The members (of Local 346) need this work,” LaBorde said. “In northern Minnesota we have a significant problem with getting good-paying jobs.”

Northern Minnesota isn’t the only area that would benefit from Sandpiper. Many supporters at the St. Paul hearing said Sandpiper would ease congestion in the state’s rail system and reduce the risk of accidents in highly populated areas. Three of four rail routes used to transport Bakken oil cross through the Twin Cities.

The new pipeline would enable parent company Enbridge to transport 225,000 barrels per day from the Bakken to its Clearbrook terminal, and 375,000 barrels per day from Clearbrook to Superior. That’s oil that might otherwise travel through Minnesota by train.

“It’s more hazardous to transport that oil by rail and truck than by pipeline,” said Mike Ratka, a Laborers Union member from Foley who has worked on multiple pipeline projects. “It’s a win-win situation.”

The proposed Sandpiper route through northern Minnesota.

The proposed Sandpiper route through northern Minnesota.

Sandpiper also would yield about $25 million in property taxes annually for local governments in Minnesota, according to Enbridge. And increased domestic oil production helps keep fuel prices down and reduces the country’s reliance on less stable foreign sources, supporters noted.

Some opponents of the pipeline worried that Sandpiper’s 616-mile route passes too close to the headwaters of the Mississippi River and poses a threat to Minnesota’s “Lakes Region,” including Cass and Crow Wing counties. Others argued construction of the pipeline would contribute to climate change.

But Matt Duncombe, a skilled pipeliner from East Grand Forks, said pipelines are the safest means of transporting crude oil because Enbridge, its contractors and their employees make safety their top priority during construction.

“Enbridge does more to set and enforce high quality and safety standards, in my experience, than any other pipeline owner I’ve worked for,” Duncombe said, noting the company’s use of third-party inspectors to monitor safety during construction.

Supporters of the pipeline wore stickers to the public hearing.

Supporters of the pipeline wore stickers to the public hearing.

Duncombe, a member of Laborers Local 563, said he received pipeline-specific, hands-on training at the union’s Lino Lakes facility – training he has since used as a laborer and foreman on the environmental crew during pipeline construction projects.

“Our top priority on the environmental crew is protection of wetlands and waterways,” Duncombe said. “The measures we installed included silt fences, hay bales, water logs, and berms, which are designed to contain runoff or prevent soil erosion. At the end of a project, our work included seeding and mulching to restore vegetation.”

Members of Operating Engineers Local 49, the Pipefitters union and other labor unions were scheduled to provide testimony at the hearing as well. They appeared before Judge Eric Lipman, a specialist in dispute resolution with the state’s Office of Administrative Hearings.

In April, Lipman will present the PUC with a report based on evidence and testimony gathered during public hearings across the state and a “trial-type hearing” later this month. People unable to attend a public hearing can offer their input using the PUC’s online forum, “Speak Up!“

The five-member commission is expected to issue a decision on approval of the Sandpiper pipeline in June.

“This isn’t the labor community against the environmental community,” said Harry Melander, president of the Minnesota Building and Construction Trades Council. “This is a needed update of a vital pipeline that the State of Minnesota and the region will benefit from.”