Council members push back against hospital cuts

Council Member Rebecca Noecker, whose ward includes St. Joseph’s Hospital, called Fairview’s proposal to close the hospital “heartbreaking” during a City Hall press conference yesterday.

Standing alongside nurses from Bethesda and St. Joseph’s yesterday, three St. Paul City Council members called on Fairview to reconsider steep cuts at the downtown hospitals and, instead, partner with the community in preserving care for St. Paul’s urban core.

“The services, the jobs and what it means for our community – we cannot do without them in downtown,” said Rebecca Noecker, whose second ward includes St. Joseph’s.

Fairview confirmed in December it is weighing several proposals to cut costs, and permanently closing St. Joe’s, the state’s oldest hospital, is among them.

At nearby Bethesda, Fairview already has moved to cut the facility’s admissions capacity from 90 to 50 beds.

Together, the proposed cuts amount to an “abandonment of the central city,” Council Member Jane Prince said, adding that Fairview executives “have to answer” for “a very serious decision that they are making to walk away from downtown St. Paul.”

To that end, Prince, Noecker and Dai Thao, whose first ward includes Bethesda, plan to introduce a resolution at the council meeting tomorrow opposing the hospital cuts, and demanding Fairview be more transparent and inclusive of community leaders in whatever service reductions play out at the facilities.

At a press conference inside City Hall yesterday, council members did not mask their frustration with Fairview’s failure to engage community leaders before announcing the proposed cuts. Thao said he learned what was happening from media reports in December.

“This is not acceptable,” Thao said. “When health care corporations make decisions without the community being a part of it, we know it’s not about delivering care. We know it’s about delivering profits.”

Antoinette Fiagbedzi, a nurse at Bethesda, calls out Fairview for putting profits before patients.

Noecker acknowledged “systemic issues” facing Fairview, like limited access to quality health insurance and mental-health treatment, but said Fairview executives have so far ignored offers to work collaboratively toward solutions that benefit the provider and the community.

“We are all standing around holding this safety net together, and we cannot have one of our critical partners unilaterally drop their side of the safety net and walk away from that conversation,” Noecker said. “We all need to stay in it together to solve these issues.”

The Minnesota Nurses Association, which represents nurses at both Bethesda and St. Joseph’s, has begun negotiations with Fairview to ensure layoffs are handled according to the union contract, MNA President Mary Turner said.

But Turner warned the cuts at Bethesda, one of only two long-term rehabilitation hospitals in Minnesota, won’t just be felt by hospital staff. Closing St. Joseph’s, which devotes 100 of its beds to inpatient mental-health care and serves the city’s high-poverty neighborhoods, would expand the ripple effect even further.

“There is no way we can do without Bethesda and no way we can do without those 100 phychiatric beds in St. Joe’s,” Turner said.

Nurses at the press conference questioned Fairview’s decision to put care for the most vulnerable members of the community on the chopping block when the nonprofit health system sits on hundreds of millions of dollars in hedge fund and other financial investments – and recently raised CEO James Hereford’s pay to $913 an hour.

“Health care is not about if you have income or not,” Bethesda nurse Antoinette Fiagbedzi said. “When you care about people, you don’t think about their income. You don’t think of whether they have insurance or not. You do it out of love.

“That’s what we stand for, that’s what my colleagues stand for.”

Nurses buy – and forgive – $2.6 million in medical debt for Minnesotans

MNA President Mary Turner (L) and Executive Director Rose Roach rip up medical debt for 1,800 Minnesotans.

Twin Cities community members overwhelmingly supported Allina nurses during their historic strike last year. Today, members of the Minnesota Nurses Association offered a thank-you gift for that support, purchasing and forgiving the past-due accounts of 1,800 families facing a combined $2.6 million in medical debt.

MNA, a union of more than 20,000 registered nurses, located and acquired the accounts with help from RIP Medical Debt, a New York-based non-profit. Like a collection agency, the organization buys medical debt at a fraction of its value.

Rather than aggressively pursuing the debt it purchased, though, MNA immediately forgave it.

“Nurses are happy to allow these families to be free of their debt,” MNA President Mary Turner said. “They’ve had this medical debt hanging over their heads for two years or more.  It’s cost them their credit, pushed them toward bankruptcy and hurt them in so many ways.”

MNA paid $28,000 for the $2.6 million balance.

Names and other details regarding the forgiven accounts will remain private, but one Minnesotan struggling to pay down medical debt, Debra Puchala, agreed to tell her story during a press conference at MNA’s headquarters in St. Paul this morning.

Debra Puchala speaks about her battle to get out of medical debt. (MNA photos by Chris Reinke)

After undergoing hip replacement surgery in September 2015 and shoulder surgery the following year, Puchala owes various medical providers more than $5,000.

“The bills kept coming,” she said. “When you have surgery, you know, you get more than one bill, and … everybody wants their money right away. I was told that I was going too slow.”

One of her six bills wound up in collection, and as a result, Puchala said, “I can’t make a regular medical appointment. I have to go to either urgent care or, if it gets bad, emergency.”

In January 2017, faced with the prospect of tacking on another $5,000 to her debt load before reaching the insurance plan’s deductible, Puchala dropped out of her physical therapy regimen, and she continues to put off knee replacement surgery, she said, “because I can’t take on the debt.”

MNA has long derided the U.S. health care system for forcing patients like Puchala into consumer decisions that pit their wellness against their other needs, like food and rent.

Medical debt is the No. 1 cause of bankruptcy in the U.S. Past due accounts to health care providers are cited in 62 percent of bankruptcy cases, and bad debt to medical providers is expected to top $200 billion by 2019.

“Medical bills are now the No. 1 reason people are contacted by debt collectors,” Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson said at the MNA press conference. “Even people with health insurance face unpaid medical bills due to the very high deductibles in many insurance policies.

“The Minnesota Nurses Association is generous to have relieved people from the weight of this debt.”

The union was inspired to acquire Minnesotans’ medical debt after several members watched a report on HBO’s “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver” about RIP Medical Debt.

“We’d had many discussions about how to repay the community for what they gave nurses during the strike,” Turner said. “The John Oliver show inspired us, and we decided to see if we could do the same thing. MNA is grateful to RIP Medical Debt for helping us make this happen.”

About 5,000 MNA members who work at Abbott Northwestern, Mercy, United and Unity hospitals and Phillips Eye Institute spent nearly a month and a half on the picket line last year in a campaign to keep their high-quality health insurance, improve workplace safety and protect patients from staffing shortages.

Striking nurses weigh contract proposal in advance of voting Monday

MNA spokesperson Angela Becchetti, a nurse at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, talks with media about Allina's most recent proposal to striking nurses.

MNA spokesperson Angela Becchetti, a nurse at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, talks with media about Allina’s most recent proposal to striking nurses.

Striking nurses will vote Monday on a three-year contract proposal from Allina that makes some gains on staffing and safety – two of their top issues – but wasn’t good enough to win a recommendation from the union’s bargaining team.

Nurses fought tooth and nail with Allina over the course of mediated talks this week that spanned three days but “felt much longer than that,” United Hospital nurse and bargaining team member Bunny Engeldorf said at a press conference in Minneapolis today.

“It was not easy to leave that table,” she added, without a tentative agreement they could recommend, but all 15 members of the bargaining team agreed Allina nurses deserve an opportunity to vote.

Angela Becchetti, a nurse at Abbott Northwestern Hospital and union spokesperson, said negotiators are “confident nurses will make the best informed decision come Monday.”

More than 4,000 members of the Minnesota Nurses Association have been on strike at five Allina facilities in the Twin Cities area since Labor Day.

Voting Monday will take place at four locations close to the picket lines outside United Hospital in St. Paul, Abbott Northwestern and Phillips Eye Institute in Minneapolis, Mercy Hospital in Coon Rapids and Unity Hospital in Fridley. Nurses already are able to review the 41-page contract proposal, and the union will hold several meetings to answer questions and discuss the terms.

In talks that began Tuesday, nurses were finally able to get Allina to address their staffing concerns. The provider agreed to establish a labor-management team to evaluate whether charge nurses should be assigned patients. Combined with provisions to improve nurses’ safety on the job, the staffing language represents some progress on “what we wanted this contract to address,” Engeldorf said.

Allina’s top priority in contract negotiations, which began in February, was eliminating nurses’ preferred, quality health insurance plans and moving them into the provider’s corporate plans.

Nurses eventually relented, but they continued to fight for language assuring their benefits would not diminish over the course of the contract. They came away with a partial victory, negotiators said, noting that it was an improvement on what Allina offered in talks before the strike began.

MNA Executive Director Rose Roach said bargaining issues with Allina felt “like dealing with molasses,” and she credited the 15 members of the union’s bargaining team for having “pushed as far as they could.”

If a majority votes to reject the proposal Monday, the strike will continue. If members vote to accept, union leaders and Allina will begin discussing how the 4,000-plus strikers return to work.

Until the two sides reach a settlement, picket lines will stay up, and union negotiators were quick to dispel any notion that nurses would begin crossing the line before then. Striking nurses are set to lose their employer-provided health insurance tomorrow.

“Allina thinks Oct. 1 is a deadline for their nurses,” Becchetti said. “It’s not. We’re calling it Red October. We’ll be out here in full force.”

Regardless of how the vote goes, one thing is already clear: The relationship between Allina Health and its nurses is at an all-time low.

“The level of disrespect they have shown for their greatest ally, the nurses, has cost them something that can’t be put on a balance sheet,” Roach said.

Hospital workers take a stand for paid sick time

Madeline Gardner, a member of the MN Nurses Association, spoke in favor of a citywide ordinance making paid sick time mandatory.

Madeline Gardner, a member of the MN Nurses Association, spoke in favor of a citywide ordinance making paid sick time mandatory.

Nurses and hospital workers today added their voices to the call for guaranteed access to earned sick and safe time for all workers, urging members of the Minneapolis City Council to take up a robust citywide ordinance when they meet Thursday.

It’s estimated 42 percent of Twin Cities workers don’t receive earned sick and safe time benefits. They are forced to make choices no one should have to make, health care workers said at a press conference outside Abbott Northwestern Hospital.

Jeff Sarro, who schedules patient appointments at Abbott Northwestern, said he’s “witnessed several patients have to choose between their appointments and feeding their families.”

Madeline Gardner, a labor and delivery nurse, said working parents shouldn’t be forced to choose “between staying home with a child who’s too sick to go to school or being able to pay the rent that month. Life just doesn’t need to be that stressful.”

And Christina Cortez, who has worked at the McDonald’s restaurant inside Abbott Northwestern for 10 years, said she still doesn’t get earned sick time – even though she works in a health care facility.

The press conference was organized by the Minnesota Nurses Association, SEIU Healthcare Minnesota and the Twin Cities-based worker center CTUL to highlight support for the policy recommendations of the Workplace Partnership Group, a task force set up by Minneapolis’ mayor and city council.

Jeff Sarro, who schedules patients' appointments at Abbott Northwestern, said it's not uncommon to hear people say they can't take time off work to get well.

Jeff Sarro, who schedules patients’ appointments at Abbott Northwestern, said it’s not uncommon to hear people say they can’t take time off work to get well.

At a news conference yesterday, workers and business owners of color gave their support to the WPG’s recommendations.

The WPG included representatives of large and small businesses, as well as workers, and it hosted listening sessions across the city over the last four months before voting 13-1 in favor of its recommendations.

If turned into a citywide ordinance, Gardner said, the WPG recommendations would make for “breath-of-fresh-air public policy.”

A group similar to the WPG is considering earned sick and safe time recommendations to the St. Paul City Council. The advisory committee is expected to finish its work by this summer.

Law judge rules North Memorial violated labor law, orders hospital to reinstate fired worker

NLRBNorth Memorial Medical Center illegally fired one worker and unlawfully attempted to block others from participating in a campaign to fight staffing cuts and protect patient safety at the Robbinsdale hospital, an administrative law judge ruled Friday.

Acting on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Judge Christine Dibble upheld charges of unfair labor practices filed by two unions, the Minnesota Nurses Association and SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, and she ordered North Memorial to reinstate Melvin Anderson, an SEIU member fired after joining informational picketing outside the hospital in June 2014, with back pay.

“By giving him his job back and paying back pay for the time they took from him, this ruling shows that workers can stand up for what is right for patients and workers and not have to fear for their job,” SEIU Healthcare Minnesota President Jamie Gulley said. “Melvin, and all of the members of SEIU and MNA who continue to stand up for patient safety, should take pride that this ruling only reinforces their fight.”

Members of the two unions staged informational picketing June 26, 2014, after hospital management moved unilaterally to cut staffing among nurses, dietary aides, housekeepers and other support workers. The cuts, workers said, made it more difficult for them to provide the quality of care North Memorial’s patients deserve.

Union nurses and health care workers picketed outside North Memorial June 26.

Union nurses and health care workers picketed outside North Memorial June 26.

Management took action to block union organizers and officers from talking with members in the days before informational picketing, calling security guards to escort two union representatives off the property and forcing an off-duty nurse to change out of a union t-shirt.

Those actions, Dibble ruled, amount to an unlawful infringement on workers’ right to engage in “protected, concerted activity” regarding the terms and conditions of their employment, as enshrined in the National Labor Relations Act.

“We are pleased that the Board has vindicated our rights to represent our union and recognized the injustice of the employer’s attempt to harass and intimidate legitimate union activity,” MNA representative Joe McMahon said.

Specifically, the ruling confirmed that workers are entitled to have conversations with union staff or stewards in public areas – like a hospital’s cafeteria – free from intimidation or surveillance. Employers may not deny union representatives access to their property unless they are being disruptive, and employers may not prohibit union members or representatives from displaying union logos.

In addition to reinstating Anderson with back pay, the ruling requires North Memorial to post on its bulletin boards that it has committed the unfair labor practices and will halt them immediately.

North Memorial may file an exception to Dibble’s ruling. If no timely exception is filed, her findings become the NLRB’s official decision.

Read the full ruling here.

Read the Union Advocate’s report on the safe staffing campaign at North Memorial.

Rose Roach: It’s health care, not ‘wealth care’ – and it’s a human right

Rose Roach is executive director of the Minnesota Nurses Association.

Rose Roach is executive director of the Minnesota Nurses Association.

A. Phillip Randolph, union organizer and president of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, once said, “The essence of trade unionism is social uplift. The labor movement has been the haven for the dispossessed, the despised, the neglected, the downtrodden, the poor.”

The essence of trade unionism is social uplift. What better issue to provide a “social uplift” than for labor to commit itself to achieving health care as a human right?

The Minnesota Nurses Association – and all labor – sees the devastation our current health care system perpetrates every day, as more and more working families struggle to afford access to quality health care simply because of cost.

Labor can no longer win this “benefit” at the bargaining table. Health insurance benefits have been (and continue to be) the No. 1 issue of contention at virtually every bargaining table across the country for decades, and health care is at the heart of almost every labor strike that has taken place during that period.

We try to figure out a way to decrease costs, only to discover that the only way that’s possible in this profit-driven, market-based system is through a corresponding decrease in benefits.

The insurance brokers tell us the cost increases are our fault because we’re utilizing the product. You see, we’re a financial loss to the insurance company once we access the health care system. The only way health insurance companies can make money for their shareholders is to deny care.

It’s the CEO’s and shareholders at companies like Wellpoint, United Healthcare and Aetna who are profiting from this immoral system – certainly not union members or their families. That’s why you can’t treat health care like a consumable good.

The health care debate has produced some very complex questions, arguments and concerns. But the central issue isn’t really a technical one. It’s a moral one.

Our elected officials need to see that health care is a public good – it is about protecting the public’s health – and they must have the political will to invest in needed services for the whole population. We get politicians to do that by building a movement. We make people understand why the system is broken and lay it at the door of the culprits – the “wealth care” industry.

President Jimmy Carter said, “Every advance in this half-century – Social Security, civil rights, Medicare, aid to education, one after another – came with the support and leadership of American labor.” The American labor movement has an obligation to our heritage to carry on our great tradition of being at the forefront of all significant social change in this country.

It’s time for labor to take its rightful place at the front of the movement to recognize health care as a human right and prioritize the implementation of a single-payer health care system.

It’s time to wake the sleeping giant, time to educate, agitate, organize and mobilize. This is the issue that does it all.

Let’s rejuvenate the labor movement. Let’s educate workers to fear the status quo – not change – when it comes to the health care system. Let’s agitate workers so they understand the power is within them to make this change happen. Let’s organize the unorganized by showing them the labor movement knows how to get them quality, affordable, accessible health care through a single-payer system. And let’s mobilize them to hit the streets, take on the valueless health insurance industry and tell their elected officials they support health care as a human right.

It is the 21st century labor movement’s destiny to ensure health care for all. In the words of the great labor leader Dolores Huerta, “Si Se Puedes!”

– Rose Roach is executive director of the Minnesota Nurses Association, a 20,000-member union of professional nurses statewide. Before joining MNA in October 2014, Roach worked with the Campaign for a Healthy California, which advocates for a single payer health care system in California.

Want a healthier Minnesota? Pass paid sick, family leave policies

Sen. Katie Sieben (DFL-Newport), a lead offer on legislation to expand access to paid family leave, speaks at a press conference at the Capitol.

Sen. Katie Sieben (DFL-Newport), a lead offer on paid family leave legislation, joins a coalition of workers, faith leaders and business owners working on the issue.

 

Workers shouldn’t have to choose between earning a paycheck and getting medical care, or caring for a newborn child. That’s the essence of labor’s support for legislation that would expand access to earned sick time and paid family leave among Minnesota workers.

But officials with the Minnesota Department of Health today offered another reason for expanding paid leave: a healthier Minnesota.

“Paid sick and family leave is an economic issue, but it is also a public health issue,” MDH Commissioner Edward Ehlinger said at a Capitol press conference, where the department issued a white paper touting the public health benefits of public policies that expand access to sick and family leave.

DFL lawmakers have included such measures in their proposed Working Parents Act, which would mandate the state’s employers offer workers, at minimum, one hour of sick time for every 30 hours on the clock. The bill would also create an insurance program to increase the availability of paid family leave.

Four of 10 workers in Minnesota do not have access to even one paid sick day, according to an analysis released by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research last fall. Just 13 percent of Minnesotans enjoy paid family leave.

Earned sick time and family leave fall even more out of reach for Minnesota’s low-income and part-time workers. The MDH found “significant inequities” that create a “cascading effect on families and entire communities, including children, the elderly and people with disabilities.”

Peggy Flanagan, director of the Children’s Defense Fund-Minnesota, said the report shows communities of color and the state’s American Indian population are hardest hit.

Parents in these communities, already struggling with cyclical poverty, are less likely to take time off to care for a newborn and more likely to send a sick child to school. That creates “an even steeper ladder to success later in life,” Flanagan said.

MNA President Linda Hamilton urges common-sense legislation to guarantee access to earned sick and safe time.

MNA President Linda Hamilton urges common-sense legislation to guarantee access to earned sick and safe time.

It also makes other people sick – another point driven home by the MDH paper.

Minnesotans who lack sick-time benefits often work in jobs that require contact with the public, like food service and health care. The MDH linked at least 208 outbreaks of foodborne illness between 2004 and 2013 to people working while sick, and it attributed 579 disease outbreaks from 2004 to 2011 to “person-to-person transmission in public settings.”

“People who are sick belong home in bed, not in the workplace,” Linda Hamilton, president of the Minnesota Nurses Association, said.

What’s more, workers with access to paid sick leave are more likely to get preventative health care, recover from illnesses faster and reduce the spread of disease. That boosts workers’ productivity in the long-run, Eden Prairie small business owner Verne Severson said.

“I need my employees to be at their best, and employees are at their best when they stay home when sick and they take care of their families,” he said.

Unfortunately, not all employers take the long view, as Minneapolis resident Octancia Adams knows too well.

Commissioner Ehlinger, state lawmakers and others at the press conference listened as Adams recalled being pregnant with her second child eight years ago, when she was working at McDonald’s. The job did not offer paid-sick benefits or paid family leave, and Adams faced a difficult decision when told she would need four to six weeks of rest to recover from a cesarean-section delivery.

Octancia Adams, who returned to work at McDonald's 10 days after having a cesarean section, is now helping lobby for a bill that would expand access to paid family leave.

Octancia Adams, who returned to work at McDonald’s 10 days after having a cesarean section, is now helping lobby for a bill that would expand access to paid family leave.

“I had a choice between returning to work and losing my job,” she said.

Adams chose her job, returning after only 10 days. She’s been paying the price ever since. Adams continues to suffer from a herniated disc and scar tissue that could hemorrhage if she has another child.

“I feel pain every time I ovulate,” she said. “I go back to the doctor, and they tell me there’s nothing more they can do for me.”

Lawmakers can do something to create better options for working mothers, Adams said, so they don’t face the impossible choice she faced eight years ago.

“It shouldn’t be a ‘nice-to-have,’” Flanagan said of paid family leave and earned-sick time. “It should be a must-have.”

NLRB: North Memorial responded to staffing campaign with harassment, retaliation

Union nurses and health care workers picketed outside North Memorial June 26.

Union nurses and health care workers picketed outside North Memorial June 26.

North Memorial Hospital illegally retaliated against union nurses and health care workers who participated in a campaign to fight staffing cuts and protect patient safety at the Robbinsdale hospital, according to a complaint issued this week by the Minneapolis-based Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board.

The complaint finds merit to charges of unfair labor practices filed by two unions working together on the staffing campaign at North Memorial, the Minnesota Nurses Association and SEIU Healthcare Minnesota. A press release issued jointly today detailed the unions’ charges.

MNA and SEIU Healthcare Minnesota filed charges with the NLRB after the hospital fired one employee, revoked work agreements and forced employees to work weekends, “repeatedly interrogated” staff about their union activities, warned employees and union staff that talking about unions was prohibited and threatened to file charges if discussions continued – all because they participated in the June picketing.

Members of the two unions staged informational picketing June 26 after hospital management moved unilaterally to cut staffing among nurses, dietary aides, housekeepers and other support workers. The cuts, workers said, made it more difficult for them to provide the quality of care North Memorial’s patients deserve.

Melvin Anderson, an SEIU member who took part in informational picketing, was fired from his position in the sterile processing unit at North Memorial – “a move alleged to be illegal by the NLRB,” according to the unions.

“Despite the challenges that North Memorial’s retaliation has caused for me, I don’t regret for one second that I spoke up for safe staffing levels and patient safety,” Anderson said. “I hope this ruling makes North Memorial understand that they can’t intimidate employees and that it is time to finally address their staffing levels. My co-workers are telling me that recent cuts in staff are putting their safety and patient safety at risk.”

The NLRB will hold a hearing on the case in January. If the board agrees that North Memorial committed unfair labor practices, it could order the hospital to compensate workers who were the target of harassment or retaliation, like Anderson.

Presidents from MNA and SEIU Healthcare Minnesota also commented on the complaint against North Memorial. MNA President Linda Hamilton:

North Memorial management’s actions were outrageous. Hospital staff were exercising their legal rights to a peaceful event to protest staffing plans that could endanger patient safety. The hospital should have used its energy to create safe staffing levels that ensure patient safety and allowed nurses to perform quality work.

SEIU Healthcare Minnesota President Jamie Gulley:

SEIU Healthcare Minnesota members bravely raised their voices to address staffing levels at North Memorial in June, but instead of listening to their front line staff, North Memorial decided instead to retaliate against and even fire workers who took part in the informational picket. The ruling Tuesday from the NLRB recognized this for what it is: harassment and intimidation. As staffing levels continue to decline, posing increased risks to patients, North Memorial must stop retaliating against employees and should instead focus on making certain their hospital has safe staffing levels as they care for our families.

View The Union Advocate’s coverage of the June 26 informational picketing in Robbinsdale.

Nurses, support workers unite for safe staffing at North Memorial Hospital

web.MNA-group

North Memorial nurses and support staff join informational picketing outside the hospital, warning of unsafe cuts to staffing pushed by management.

ROBBINSDALE – Rankled by North Memorial Hospital’s plan to cut their staffing levels, nurses and support staff united for informational picketing outside the facility here today.

Hospital management, union leaders say, has moved unilaterally to cut staffing among nurses, dietary aides, housekeepers and other support workers to dangerously low levels. Nurses, for example, are now expected to spend 11 minutes per visit with a patient, down from the previous standard of 20 minutes, Minnesota Nurses Association President Linda Hamilton said.

“Patients need a whole lot more time than that,” Hamilton said. “But unfortunately, North Memorial has decided to put profits before patients.”

Jamie Gulley, president of SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, said support workers, like registered nurses, see the impact of cuts to staffing – and the threat they pose to patient care.

“Members of SEIU and MNA have joined together to shine a spotlight on corporatization of health care at North memorial,” Gulley said. “It’s unconscionable for this hospital to prevent us from giving the care we want to give and that patients deserve.”

North Memorial nurses said they already had seen impacts of the cuts.

“Just having eyes on our patients – sometimes it’s the difference between noticing changes, or that something’s not right,” RN Christine Raatikka said. “It’s very stressful.”

“We are out picketing today because the plan proposed by North Memorial to cut staffing levels is dangerous and could put patients lives at risk if implemented,” Jennifer Kappel, a nursing assistant at North Memorial and SEIU member, added. “We work hard and care deeply about our patients, and will continue fighting these cuts to protect their safety.”

Presidents Linda Hamilton (MNA), Jamie Gulley (SEIU Healthcare MN) and Bobby Kasper (St. Paul Regional Labor Federat-ion) walked the picket line together.

Presidents Linda Hamilton (MNA), Jamie Gulley (SEIU Healthcare MN) and Bobby Kasper (St. Paul Regional Labor Federat-ion) walked the picket line together.

Hastings nurses authorize strike as Allina sticks with second-rate offer

Nurses outside United Hospital, owned by Allina Health, stand in solidarity with nurses in negotiations with Allina at Regina Medical Center in Hastings.

Nurses outside United Hospital, owned by Allina Health, stand in solidarity with nurses in negotiations with Allina at Regina Medical Center in Hastings.

Union nurses are keeping the pressure on Allina Health to do right by their colleagues at Regina Medical Center in Hastings, where nurses voted yesterday to authorize their leadership to call a strike if contract talks break down.

Meanwhile, about 100 nurses and supporters from the labor community staged informational picketing outside Allina-owned United Hospital downtown St. Paul today in a show of solidarity with the Hastings nurses.

Regina nurses, members of the Minnesota Nurses Association, have refused to accept disparities between the contract Allina is offering them and contracts covering MNA members at other Allina facilities in the Twin Cities area.

This is the first contract the two sides have attempted to bargain since Allina purchased Regina last year, and the strike-authorization vote – approved by an overwhelming margin – shows Regina’s 90-plus nurses aren’t backing down.

“We hope we can return to the table and Allina realizes how serious we are about not being considered a second-rate community hospital,” said Regina nurse Jane Traynor, a member of the union’s bargaining team.

In negotiations that began in the fall, Allina has insisted on excluding Regina nurses from pension and health benefits extended to MNA members at Allina facilities within 20 minutes of Hastings. That double standard, nurses say, could have a negative impact on the quality of nursing care in the Hastings facility.

“What incentive do our nurses have to stay at Regina Medical Center if they can get better choices in health insurance and a pension plan in River Falls or St. Paul?” Traynor asked.

Bargaining team member Nikole Nickle said a second-rate contract would “drain” experienced nurses from Regina to work in other hospitals.

“About 80 percent of Regina nurses live in the Hastings area,” Nickle said. “We’re taking care of our friends, our family members, our neighbors. This is about them, about their quality of care.”

United Hospital nurses like Bernadine Engeldorf joined the solidarity picket today to show Regina nurses – and to show management at Allina – their support extends across the Metro Area.

“When you’re negotiating a contract with an employer who is telling you, ‘No, we can’t do that,’ it’s important to hear from other employees who say, ‘Yes, they can,’” Engeldorf said. “That’s why the 6,000 nurses of United Hospital are standing in solidarity with our sisters and brothers in Hastings, who don’t deserve to be treated second rate.

“We’re all telling Allina Health to do the right thing.”

web.Nurses-unitedDSC_0587_6679